This is too rich for me to pass up. The McCain campaign has complained to YouTube that it acted hastily in removing many videos produced and uploaded after YouTube received DMCA takedown notices.
The campaign’s solution? YouTube needs to make an exemption for political ads. YouTube’s response is perfectly framed:
…citing the DMCA, a controversial copyright law that McCain voted to approve a decade ago, Levine pointed out that YouTube risks being sued itself if it doesn’t respond promptly to takedown notices.
…”YouTube does not possess the requisite information about the content in user-uploaded videos to make a determination as to whether a particular takedown notice includes a valid claim of infringement,” Levine wrote. “The claimant and the uploader, not YouTube, hold all of the relevant information in this regard, including the source of any content used, the ownership rights to the content, and any licensing arrangements in place between the parties.”
YouTube to McCain: You Made Your DMCA Bed, Lie in It | Threat Level from Wired.com.
This all puts me in mind of the story from a few years ago about Sen. Ted Stevens recieving an iPod as a gift and gaining a sudden appreciation for the issues surrounding fair use and the entertainment industry’s draconian anti-consumer goals.
And when Stevens asked whether with the audio flag in place he would be able to record from the radio and put the shows onto his iPod: that’s when the RIAA’s Mitch Bainwol really began to sweat.
With that simple question, the octogenarian Senator encapsulated arguments about place-shifting, interoperability, and fair use that would have taken whole federal dockets to explain a few years ago.
If you would like to help Congresional leaders further appreciate the plight of the forgotten consumer, check out the IPac iPod for Seantors Campiagn.